Search for: "Wilson v. Chancellor" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2017, 2:01 am by Ed Arnold, CMS
On 27 and 28 March 2017, the Supreme Court heard the appeal of R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor & Another in which it considered whether the order imposing fees in the employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal is indirectly discriminatory and whether it breaches the EU principle of effectiveness. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Wilson Sonsini memo reviews the Delaware Chancery Court’s recent decision in IRA Trust FBO Bobbi Ahmed v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:19 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Ronald Wilson, who served as the Ombudsman at UCI from 1978 until 1999 and was a national figure in the art of mediation and Ombudsmanship, has passed away.Michael Chennault, the current Ombuds at UC Irvine, writes this about his colleague and mentor:From 1978 until his retirement in 2002, Ron addressed and resolved problems and concerns of the UCI community in his role as Assistant Executive Vice Chancellor and University Ombudsman. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
The decision provides some certainty to multi-class companies that are seeking to adopt these amendments and avoids opening the kind of can of worms with respect to prior charter amendments that many SPACs have had to deal with as a result of Vice Chancellor Zurn’s decision in Garfield v. [read post]
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, and is based on a WSGR Alert memorandum by Chancellor William Chandler, David Berger, Katherine Henderson, Steven Guggenheim, Amy Simmerman, and Tamika Montgomery-Reeves. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 2:05 am by INFORRM
  The Ministerial Statement made by David Gauke the Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary can be found here. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 4:05 am by Broc Romanek
” This is a problem that I wrote about last December after then Chancellor Leo Strine’s ruling in Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Brett Wilson’s Media Law Blog has covered the case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB), which concerned the liability of a blogger for comments regarding a planning dispute. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The doctrine is a subset of the broader doctrine of res judicata (see Wilson v Dantas, 29 NY3d at 1062). [read post]