Search for: "Wilson v. City of Jersey City" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The doctrine is a subset of the broader doctrine of res judicata (see Wilson v Dantas, 29 NY3d at 1062). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:48 am by Eliana Baer
While the comings and goings of an unrelated male can be one indicia of cohabitation, in the case of Okoshi-Wilson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“‘Collateral estoppel comes into play when four conditions are fulfilled: (1) the issues in both proceedings are identical, (2) the issue in the prior proceeding was actually litigated and decided, (3) there was a full and fair opportunity to litigate in the prior proceeding, and (4) the issue previously litigated was necessary to support a valid and final judgment on the merits'” (Wilson v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1212, 1216, quoting Conason… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am by Robin Wilson
Picarello, Jr., & Robin Fretwell Wilson, eds., Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2008) — The constitutional challenges presented by Perry v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the May 1 conference) Wilson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:46 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman represents defendants with drug charges in the Superior Court of New Jersey, the New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan and Brooklyn, and the United States District Courts located in New Jersey and New York City. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:46 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman represents defendants with drug charges in the Superior Court of New Jersey, the New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan and Brooklyn, and the United States District Courts located in New Jersey and New York City. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:35 am by admin
Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey April 6 charged a mergers and acquisitions attorney and a stock trader with conspiracy, securities fraud and other violations over their alleged roles in a long-running insider trading scheme that netted more than $32 million in illicit profits (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“ ’Collateral estoppel comes into play when four conditions are fulfilled: (1) the issues in both proceedings are identical, (2) the issue in the prior proceeding was actually litigated and decided, (3) there was a full and fair opportunity to litigate in the prior proceeding, and (4) the issue previously litigated was necessary to support a valid and final judgment on the merits’ ” (Wilson v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1212, 1216… [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:40 am
S. 194, 200, the court held that the strip search was unjustified under the Fourth Amendment test for searches of children by school officials set out in New Jersey v. [read post]