Search for: "Wilson v. Freedom of Information Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am
The post Case Preview: Kennedy v The Charity Commission appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am
In the case of Kennedy v Chairty Commission ([2014] UKSC 20), in judgments running to 90 pages, the Supreme Court dismissed this appeal by Mr Kennedy, a Times journalist, for access to documents generated by the Charity Commission under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:55 am
Attorney General CP 3 of 2016], and by the Supreme Court of New Zealand [Trevor John Momo Wilson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am
On 23 November 2011, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Sugar v BBC [2010] EWCA Civ 715, a long-standing and well-publicised dispute stemming from a freedom of information request made of the BBC in January 2005. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am
The way in which the balance is struck between the right to privacy and protection of personal data, on the one hand, and the freedom of information of internet users, on the other, varies in different parts of the world. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
Background This case results from a freedom of information request made by Stephen Sugar (a Londonsolicitor who is now deceased) in respect of the Balen Report, a report commissioned by the BBC into its own news coverage of the Middle East. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:25 am
” Based on data obtained from a Bloomberg Freedom of Information Act request, Papscun notes the departure of “99 senior-level career attorneys” from 2021-2022, including 71 experienced GS-15 level attorneys and 28 from the senior executive service. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am
Douglas Wilson, National Security Investigations and Prosecutions §§ 2:3-2.5 (2d ed. 2012) [hereinafter NSIP] (quoting Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, United States Senate, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:55 am
Lord Wilson dismissed it on the basis that information held predominantly for the purposes of journalism was exempt, and that the Balen Report fell under this category of information. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:06 am
It was commissioned following allegations of bias in the coverage. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:00 am
Google Another Suspended Twitter User Loses in Court–Wilson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
“Political advertising bans and Freedom of Expression”, Greek Public Law Journal, Vol 27, (2014) Ronan Ó Fathaigh University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR), SSRN. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm
Cearta notes that the right has received criticism from over 169 academics, arguing that the right is unnecessary given the substantial rights press publishers already accrue and could hinder freedom of information. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke v… [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:54 pm
(In passing, I note human rights commissions have stated explicitly that while genuine religious claims can infringe the legislation and possibly require accommodation, personal preferences or “a singular belief” does not fall within human rights religious protection: see, for example, here.) [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
This was the question facing the UK Information Tribunal recently in Queen Mary University of London v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Alem Matthees. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has coverage. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
Russia, an ECHR case which clarified that the preliminary collection of information by journalists is protected as part of freedom of the press. [read post]
