Search for: "Wilson v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
A quick summary of Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, reported today:The facts: The parties were married in 1996, at which time the husband was the sole owner of a company. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
The Supreme Court has allowed the appeal in Jones v Kernott, restoring the order of the county court (i.e. that Ms Jones was entitled to a 90% share of the property). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Dave
I've got parental duty so can't do a full note on Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 now. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Dave
I've got parental duty so can't do a full note on Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 now. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:52 pm by Orin Kerr
The panel featured Steve Leckar, who will be arguing the case for Jones; Melanie Wilson, a criminal procedure professor at the University of Kansas (visiting at W&M); and Paul Marcus of W&M. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
In 1985, Ms Jones and Mr Kernott bought 39 Badger Hall Avenue.  [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:53 am
Family Law Week reports today that the eagerly-awaited Supreme Court hearing in Kernott v Jones begins tomorrow (the headline of their report says today, but the report itself correctly says tomorrow). [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
Eliot Spitzer  weighs in on the 7th Circuit  Jones v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:06 am by CMS
The Justices in attendance for the hand-down will be: Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Wilson, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden and Lord Kitchin. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:06 am by Joe Hodnicki
“It’s always interesting to see how a lawyer’s oral argument marries up to their briefing, and for me, it helps give greater context to the points,” wrote Jason Wilson at The Annotated Oral Argument: Tucker v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:10 am by Anita Davies
Jones v Kernott, heard in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, garnered much media attention as the case may have a dramatic effect on the property rights of unmarried couples in England and Wales who separate. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
It just does not believe that Wilson is disabled enough not to be executed in Texas--a flagrant violation of the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 2:55 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Derick Wilson, No. 112,009 (Shawnee)State appealKevin P. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
Imputation involves concluding what the parties would have intended, whereas inference involves concluding what they did intend. ([126])And so, Jones v Kernott [2011] UKHL 53.   [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  In contrast, Master McCloud in Paxton Jones v Chichester Harbour Conservancy [2017] EWHC 2270 found that the deeming provisions operate as a means of calculating other deadlines, such as the acknowledgement of service and defence. [read post]