Search for: "Wilson v. State Bar" Results 41 - 60 of 768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2009, 5:35 am
Employee terminated after making a false statement on his employment applicationMatter of Wilson v Town of Minerva Town Bd., 2009 NY Slip Op 06214, decided on August 13, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Town of Minerva appointed Philip Wilson as a maintenance mechanic in 2001. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm by Steve Vladeck
” The question the justices will consider next Monday in Wilson v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 7:17 am by Robert Chesney
  Support Lawfare The majority concludes that Munaf (and, underneath it, Wilson) is and should be limited to circumstances where the receiving state seeks to prosecute the American for a crime committed within that state’s borders and where the person already is in that state’s territory (and voluntarily so). [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:30 pm
Wilson, that the law was not inconsistent with the United States Supreme Court holding in Coker v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by David Markus
Congrats to Judge Wilson for being recognized by the Green Bag for exemplary legal writing for his dissent in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am by Jonathan Glasson QC, Matrix.
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
The Court, in barring execution of the mentally retarded in Atkins v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 7:15 am by David Markus
  The 11th Circuit granted en banc review in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:22 am by Qui Tam
Supreme Court heard oral arguments on November 30 in the case of Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v United States ex rel Wilson.The question before the court concerns the False Claims Act's public disclosure bar, 31 USC § 3730(e)(4)(A), which bars suits based on public disclosures “in a criminal, civil or administrative hearing, in a congressional, administrative, or [GAO] report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the… [read post]