Search for: "Wimsatt v. State" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
New class action objector decision: Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
13 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
Superior Court (2004) 33 Cal.4th 407, 417; Wimsatt v. [read post]
The UCL Practitioner - http://www.uclpractitioner.com/
California Court Of Appeal Holds That Party Seeking To Enforce Forum Selection Clause As To Unwaivable Statutory Rights Has Burden To Show Enforcement Would Not Diminish Rights
25 Jun 2015, 8:15 am by James (Jim) A. Goodman
  Citing Wimsatt v. [read post]
Trade Secrets and Noncompete Blog - http://www.tradesecretsnoncompetelaw.com/
California Court Of Appeal Holds That Party Seeking To Enforce Forum Selection Clause As To Unwaivable Statutory Rights Has Burden To Show Enforcement Would Not Diminish Rights
25 Jun 2015, 8:15 am by James Goodman
  Citing Wimsatt v. [read post]
Trade Secrets and Noncompete Blog - http://www.tradesecretsnoncompetelaw.com/
No-exception confidentiality laws bar evidence of legal malpractice occurring in mediation, according to California appeals court decision
20 Jun 2007, 11:42 pm
A court decision this week from California may lend support to these criticisms.In a case titled "Wimsatt v. [read post]
Mediation Channel - http://mediationchannel.com
Supreme Court of California Reinforces Mediation Privilege
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am by stevemehta
  (See Foxgate, supra, 26 Cal.4th 1, 17; Wimsatt v. [read post]
Mediation Matters - http://stevemehta.wordpress.com
Prejean, Larry King and Hard Facts Making Bad Mediation Confidentiality Law
12 Nov 2009, 7:57 pm
(See Simmons v. [read post]
Settle It Now Negotiation Blog - http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/
New Case on Mediation Confidentiality
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by stevemehta
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JOHN PORTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
Mediation Matters - http://stevemehta.wordpress.com
Richard Prince doesn’t have to describe one of his paintings as a Rhino in Hot Pants Shouting, “Repent, Repent!” for it to be so.
27 Jan 2012, 7:54 am by pfriedman
It is true that in Blanch v. [read post]
Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity - http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman