Search for: "Windes v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2006, 4:50 pm
They appealed the social security claim and recently the Administrative Law Judge granted her disability benefits. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am
In Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, the Court of Appeals held that "For the purpose of Retirement and Social Security Law, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that the disability was the result of an accident, which is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact". [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am
In Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, the Court of Appeals held that "For the purpose of Retirement and Social Security Law, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that the disability was the result of an accident, which is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact". [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:02 pm
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 595 U.S. _____ (2022), and Biden v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:27 am
Such prospective harms could include: $132 billion loss in GDP and $5.2 billion loss in Social Security and Medicare contributions – this was before the current economic crisis brought on by COVID-19. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 7:33 pm
To court provided this explanation on this recent motion, in Karasik v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
Social Security and Medicare BenefitsII. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC has mandated environmental disclosure at least as far back as the Nixon Administration. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
The security officers are alert, but do not seem especially tense. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Windsor, invalidating a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws and programs, the Social Security Administration has amended its operating manual to address claims for benefits for same-sex couples. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm
[iv] It seems therefore that there continues to be strong head winds preventing any material growth in securities collective actions against Asian companies (and their directors) in Asia. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:54 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:02 am
Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) quoted from the 1919 decision in Schenck v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:28 am
Worried about the future of Social Security, perhaps. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-7026 November 1, 2011 Judge: Kelly Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Plaintiff Lacauna Adams, on behalf of her minor son D.J.W., appeared pro se seeking review of a district court’s judgment that affirmed the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of D.J.W. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
