Search for: "Windsor v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2015, 5:00 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
Ct. 2584 (2015) (a) Two years ago, it appeared that the United States would be divided for some years between states that recognize same-sex marriage, and states that do not recognize same- sex marriage. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:31 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 In the post United States v Windsor marriage jurisprudence, couples are challenging state constitutional bans on gay marriage by metes and bounds. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In a decision that spoke somewhat tentatively about an “evolving understanding of the meaning of equality,” the Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:40 am by Debra A. McCurdy
On December 12, 2014, CMS published a proposed rule to revise selected conditions of participation (CoPs) for providers, conditions for coverage (CfCs) for suppliers, and requirements for long-term care (LTC) facilities to conform with the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:59 am
Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (OCR) released guidance to assist covered entities in understanding their obligations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule in light of the Supreme Court's 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Adam Kielich
One of the most important changes came through the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:15 am by Brady Iandiorio
Id.A year later the United States Supreme Court, in Green Tree, upheld the notion that an arbitration provision could be disregarded where the costs preclude a plaintiff from vindicating his or her rights. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry, while the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]