Search for: "Winkler v. Winkler"
Results 1 - 20
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 5:48 am
Greenfield and Winkler covered the ruling in Horne v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:39 pm
Supreme Court that carries the Catch-22 author's surname, District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
Maria Winkler: Genau. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
That’s what “should” have happened in Bush v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 9:44 am
Kudos to my friends and UCLAW colleagues Lynn Stout and Adam Winkler, who were both quoted and/or cited several times by Justice Stevens’ dissent in the Citizen’s United v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:46 am
Since Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 1:31 pm
Message by BSALegal.org on 3/7/2006 EST Oral arguments are scheduled for April 6 in the appeal of Winkler v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 6:42 am
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company and Kristen Winkler. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:43 pm
Joined by ConLawProfs Bruce Ackerman, Vikram Amar, Jack Balkin, Burt Nueborne, James Ryan, and Adam Winkler, the Constitutional Accountability Center has filed an amicus brief in Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:11 pm
Only Adam Winkler saw an election law connection, analogizing Heller to Bush v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am
Winkler: Decided a half century before the first Supreme Court cases on the rights of African Americans and women, Bank of the United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 7:22 am
In the tradition of Gideon's Trumpet, Adam Winkler uses the landmark 2008 case District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:04 pm
By Adam Winkler, professor of law, UCLA School of Law. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 10:47 am
FEC, and Burwell v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:17 am
Professor Adam Winkler from the UCLA School of Law joins us for a high caliber discussion about New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 10:00 am
Leah Platt Boustan (UCLA, Department of Economics), Fernando V. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:01 am
You can reach him at winkler at law.ucla.edu [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
I’ll note at the outset that of course this broadly remedial rationale for the legality of its discrimination is not being urged by the University of Texas (making it unlikely that the Court could invoke it), that adopting it would also require the Court to toss aside a lot of case law (including, as discussed below, Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:50 am
Today, June 21, 2011, and tomorrow, the Ontario Court of Appeal (Chief Justice Winkler, Justices Laskin, Sharpe, Armstrong and Rouleau JJ.A.) will hear a combined appeal of, among others, the decisions in Combined Air Mechanical Services v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 5:58 am
She had to get someone to take the paperwork upstairs.This story brought to mind the SCOTUS 2004 decision in Tennessee v. [read post]
