Search for: "Wise v. Department of Transportation"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2020, 7:49 am
However, in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:36 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
The $700 per diem figure was consistent with what was used by the Ohio Department of Transportation at that time. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:44 am
Mohawk Industries, Inc., 2016 3879252 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016); Specialized Transportation of Tampa Bay, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:27 am
Moreover, unlike the seizure of M/V Wise Honest in 2018, in the present situation, the U.N. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:43 pm
Department of Transportation, et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
Department of Transportation, 165 F.3d 972, 978 (D.C. [read post]
Why Carefully Designed Public Vaccination Mandates Can—and Should—Withstand Constitutional Challenge
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
In 2015, for example, in Phillips v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am
Pound wise and penny foolish! [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:10 am
EPA took the first giant steps to curb emissions last March, when it issued new standards to cut heat-trapping pollution from new cars and SUVs, together with new fuel economy standards from the Transportation Department. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm
The term is broadly defined by Cornell Law School, citing Fischer v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:45 am
Clients: Microsoft's "Free" FEP v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:05 am
She relied upon the Third Circuit’s decision in Borse v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:59 pm
Using Allowance Value Wisely As already noted, the bill creates valuable pollution allowances that covered entities must have for compliance. [read post]
