Search for: "Witt v. Merricks"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm
Circuit Judges David Tatel, Merrick Garland, and Stephen Williams will hear oral arguments in Al Alwi v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm
Circuit Judges David Tatel, Merrick Garland, and Stephen Williams will hear oral arguments in Al Alwi v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Nebraska and Arizona v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm
Benjamin Wittes discussed Attorney General Merrick Garland’s decision to appoint a special counsel to oversee whatever potential criminal matters that might arise out of the presence of classified documents in President Biden’s Delaware home and office space. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
Scott Roehm argued that Biden administration officials need to reject the use of evidence obtained by torture in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:52 pm
Far from saving decisions such as Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am
Jane Chong summarized the oral arguments heard in the Ninth Circuit in Hawaii v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am
Benjamin Wittes sat down with Roger Parloff to discuss the Oath Keeper trial now that the case has gone to the jury. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Jonathan Siegel at PrawfsBlawg notes that Bilski v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
After the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocked President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland, holding open the seat that would eventually be filled by Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
We have Roger Parloff on the Jan. 6 criminal prosecutions, Quinta Jurecic and Molly Reynolds on the Jan. 6 Committee, Tyler McBrien on climate security, Benjamin Wittes on the Mar-a-Lago investigation, Scott R. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At the Daily Journal (subscription required), David Boyle looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
” Sedition is a serious charge, but a number of analysts (including Lawfare’s Benjamin Wittes) have raised the possibility that certain conduct related to yesterday’s debacle might meet the terms of the statute. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm
Moreover, the article acknowledges that in Clinton v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court rejected Nixon’s challenge in Nixon v. [read post]
