Search for: "Witter v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the breach of fiduciary duty causes of action, “where an allegation of fraud is essential to a breach of fiduciary duty claim, courts have applied a six-year statute of limitations under CPLR 213 (8)” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009], rearg denied 12 NY3d 889 [2009]; see Monaghan v Ford Motor Co., 71 AD3d 848, 849-850 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They state a claim for malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty–both of which have a three-year statute of limitations because defendants exclusively seek monetary damages (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009]; Matter of R.M Kliment & Frances Hals band, Architects, 3 NY3d 538, 541 [2004]). [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:58 pm by Herskovits, PLLC
Dean Witter, 83 F.3d 132 (6th Cir. 1996) Texas In re Wakefield, 293 B.R. 372 (N.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009).) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009).) [read post]