Search for: "Witters v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Goldblatt denied motions filed by multiemployer pension funds to arbitrate debtors’ objections to pension withdrawal liability claims in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 12:32 am by D. Daxton White
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 83 (2002), the United States Supreme Court determined that when the “occurrence or event giving rise to the claim” occurred is a factual matter to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the FINRA arbitration panel. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:59 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1980) (stating that Congress's intent in prohibiting the possession of firearms by felons was directly related to "the problem of firearm abuse by felons"); see also Kane v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
§ 117(a)Choice of LawAppeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Sharpe, J.), dismissing plaintiffʹs claims for breach of contract, copyright infringement, misappropriation, and unfair competition arising from its sale of equipment and software for an automated assembly system. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Although the First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees broad speech liberties to persons residing within the United States, it is not without limit. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Eugene Volokh
First, “the public accusations by Van Liew that Stansfield was ‘corrupt and a liar’” were fully protected speech: These remarks about a local public official constituted political speech and were at the core of the speech that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm by D. Daxton White
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 83 (2002), the United States Supreme Court determined that the predecessor NASD six year rule was a procedural matter that is presumptively for this Panel to decide and is not a substantive limitation. [read post]