Search for: "Wittwer v. Wittwer"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2021, 4:00 am
R v Beaver, 2020 ABCA 203 (CanLII) [13] A court must be satisfied of two things before excluding evidence under s.24(2): first, that the evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any of the rights or freedoms guaranteed by the Charter; and second, that admitting it would bring the administration of justice into disrepute (R v Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33 at para 19; R v Strachan, 1988 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1988] 2 SCR 980 at 1005-1006). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
Linn, 205 Neb. 218, 221, 286 N.W.2d 765, 767 (1980) (reviewing constitutional question in "‘the interests of substantial justice,'" though the issue had not even been raised below (quoting Wittwer v. [read post]
