Search for: "Wolff v. Wolff"
Results 121 - 140
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2012, 8:25 am
Last, Part V discusses the relevance of empathy to our understanding of justice and legal morality. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 1:57 pm
The Case The unanimous decision was made by the justices in the case of State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
Sources: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/767.407 https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/767/v/41/5/amRead More [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
In American Express Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:25 am
Plaintiff’s claim that he pleaded guilty to criminal charges in reliance on defendants’ negligent legal advice concerning the immigration consequences of the plea is barred by his guilty plea and lack of any claim of innocence (Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169, 173 [1987]; Yong Wong Park v Wolff & Samson, P.C., 56 AD3d 351 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 704 [2009]). [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:41 pm
Rudolf Wolff & Co., 484 U. [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:04 pm
Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) has published the abstracts for the Congress online, including the following ones concerning nanomaterials: “Update of potential hazards of nanomaterials,” by PA Schulte, I Iavicoli; “Overview — update of potential hazards of engineered nanomaterials,” by PA Schulte; “Noninvasive biomonitoring of 3 groups of nanomaterials workers with elevated markers of oxidative stress and inflammation,” by D Pelclova,… [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:20 am
Schoffstall, Uninsured/Underinsured Litigation after IFP v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 3:56 am
This is insufficient to make out a claim under Judiciary Law§ 487 (see Mintz v Rosenberg, Mine, Falkojf & Wolff, LLP, 53 Misc 3d 132(A), 2016 NY Slip Op 51388[U] [App Term, pt Dept 2016] [“The allegations that defendants filed a certificate of merit and/or a note of issue in the prior action when they lacked sufficient supporting medical expert opinion were not ‘sufficiently egregious’ to support (a Judiciary Law§ 487) claim”]). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that if a Bill of the UK Parliament were to change the Scottish Parliament’s competence like this, then such a Bill would engage the legislative consent convention. 15.28 Wolffe QC states that he does not consider Scottish Parliament to have any veto on the decision to trigger article 50 but that its view is relevant to the question of legislative consent. 15.26 Wolffe QC’s preliminary comments are over and he is now turning to the specific… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 8:14 pm
Wolff prepared an excellent Power Point presentation that includes cases that explain how the courts have handled situations similar to Soth’s. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:00 am
See Wolff v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:09 am
” “”[M]embers of a limited liability company (LLC) may bring derivative suits on the LLC’s behalf” (Tzolis v Wolff, 10 NY3d 100, 102; see Jacobs v Cartalemi, 156 AD3d 605; Stack v Midwood Chayim Aruchim Dialysis Assoc., Inc., 54 AD3d 935; East Quogue Jet, LLC v East Quogue Members, LLC, 50 AD3d 1089). [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:14 am
Plaintiff’s claim that he pleaded guilty to criminal charges in reliance on defendants’ negligent legal advice concerning the immigration consequences of the plea is barred by his guilty plea and lack of any claim of innocence (Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169, 173 [1987]; Yong Wang Park v Wolff & Samson, P.C., 56 AD3d 351[1st Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 704 [2009]). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 4:41 am
” We’ve written about Tzolis v Wolff many times. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:08 am
Wolff, defendants-respondents-appellant
NEW YORK COUNTYBusiness LawGeneral Release Unambiguous Releasing Defendants From Claims Asserted by Plaintiff Littman v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:57 pm
Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979), and Wolff v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
The temporary failure to receive kosher meals was an oversight that was corrected by prison officials.In Wolff v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:14 pm
While the recent Georgia Supreme Court opinion in Baker v. [read post]
