Search for: "Womack v. Womack" Results 21 - 40 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2015, 8:11 am by Amy Pierce
Recently, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District, in Womack v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
Recall that: "The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:48 pm
It is doubtful that testimony about future dangerousness could withstand Daubert [v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 1:06 pm
Sometimes the Ninth Circuit publishes an opinion not because the issue is a close one, not because the outcome of the case is at all in doubt, and not because the opinion technically meets the standards for publication, but rather because the panel (and case) is a good one in which to move the law a tiny little bit towards the way you'd like it to be, without the risk that anyone else on the court will be able to successfully call for en banc review.Like here. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 5:40 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  It is styled, Lamarr Womack & Associates, L.P.; dba LWA Architects, et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:31 pm
As the ILB reported on Jan. 10th, "The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:27 pm
As a result of the investigation, Thomas was charged with prescription fraud, possession of Schedule II and III narcotics for resale and simple possession of a Schedule V narcotic. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:40 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 151861 (ED CA, Nov. 6, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's complaint that he was not permitted by Jewish chaplains to convert to Judaism because he was serving a life sentence.In Womack v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:00 am
Womack's concurrence noted it is impossible to inflict serious bodily injury without using a deadly weapon as the Court had held in Blount v. [read post]