Search for: "Womack v. Womack"
Results 81 - 100
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2009, 1:00 pm
Judges Womack and Price dissented. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
Judge Womack didn't join note 7 either, but then, he also didn't join the conclusion. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:30 am
Womack, No. 139592, for a determination whether the failure to seek appellate review was caused by ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:58 am
Indiana Dept. of Local Government Finance, and Martha Womacks Lokmar Y. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
Evans v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:03 am
According to the dissent, this case was like Vennus v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Michael Reed v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
The Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Lykos v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Most importantly, the CCA had previously noted in Moreno v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:07 am
Womack-Sang v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:10 pm
The CCA has previously held, in Briceno v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:07 am
Judge Price, joined by Judges Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Holcomb, and Cochran, first set out that testimonial statements are statements that an objective witness would reasonably believe would be available for use at a later trial. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Well, um, in Miles v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:59 am
The case, out of Judge Dana Womack’s state district court in Fort Worth, involved allegations of failure to repay money lent pursuant to a promissory note. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:17 am
Womack v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:15 am
Judge Womack concurred. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm
v=wall Twitter: @rep_stevewomack Congressional District 4 Rep. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:03 am
While Hughen tried to rely upon Michigan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 5:19 pm
From Pruitt v. [read post]
