Search for: "Womack v. Womack"
Results 81 - 100
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2009, 9:35 am
Judge Womack noted that the jury in Norris's case had been instructed on a theory of transferred intent that the CCA overruled in Roberts v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:03 am
While Hughen tried to rely upon Michigan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
ROBERT SCOTT, HONORABLECOMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, THORNTON KEEL, DONNA KEEL, MICHAEL HELLRUNG, DONNA HELLRUNG, WILLIAM PASCHALL, DAVID WOMACK, NATALIE KLOSS, DARRYL HUBBELL AND AMY HUBBELL; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00576-CV, 275 SW3d 558, 11-14-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009)09-0138CITY OF AUSTIN, ET AL. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Judge Womack concurred without an opinion. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:15 am
Judge Womack concurred. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:10 am
Judges Price and Womack concurred without an opinon. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:09 am
State and Craven v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Most importantly, the CCA had previously noted in Moreno v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
[Presumably this concurrence went to press before Price was able to read Arizona v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
Moreover, Rabb pre-dated Marin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
Judges Womack and Johnson merely concurred, so who knows what that means. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:05 pm
For a more detailed summary click here.PD-1687-07, Daniel Rey v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:00 pm
Judges Womack and Price dissented. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Danny Wayne Grammer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:27 pm
As a result of the investigation, Thomas was charged with prescription fraud, possession of Schedule II and III narcotics for resale and simple possession of a Schedule V narcotic. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:55 am
Daniel Layton v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:15 am
For a more detailed summary click here.State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:02 am
Steven Sanchez v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
Carlos Rivas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
[He still has a capital murder conviction as to the other victims.]Judges Price and Womack concurred to explain why they vote to overrule Norris v. [read post]
