Search for: "Wood v. Collins" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Wood, Abby K., Disclosing Campaign Financing (2024), Oxford Handbook of American Election (forthcoming), USC CLASS Research Paper No. 24-1. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
IPSO  13241-21 Wood v Helensburgh Advertiser, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 01139-22 Mehson v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02465-22 Gleeson v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 02466-22 Gleeson v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy… [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a hearing in COS v PER and another before Collins Rice J. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 6 April 2022, judgment on meaning was handed down by Collins Rice J in Sivananthan v Vasikaran [2022] EWHC 837 (QB). [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction What Is the Tax Gap and What Proposals Are Available? [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:37 am by Jon Levitan and Andrew Hamm
She also released three opinions, including in one case, Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: At the Pacific Legal Foundation blog, Jonathan Wood argues that the foundation’s pending petition in California Sea Urchin Commission v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and two Resolution Statements from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 01577-18 Chiariello v Mail Online– Resolved through IPSO Mediation engaging provisions 1 (Accuracy), 2 (Privacy), 3 (Harassment) and 9 (Reporting of Crime) Resolution Statement 00850-18 Bellamy v The Sunday Times– Resolved through IPSO Mediation engaging… [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC; Federalist Society panel video with Gregory Dolin, John Duffy, Arti Ray, and Robert Greene Sterne; Jeffri Kaminski, WLF] Collins v. [read post]