Search for: "Wood v. Gordon" Results 21 - 40 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am by INFORRM
Together with this, the test laid down by Laws LJ in R(Wood) v Commissioner of the Metropolis provides a firm guiding hand to this notoriously difficult balancing act: First, the alleged threat or assault to the individual’s personal autonomy must (if article 8 is to be engaged) attain ‘a certain level of seriousness’. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Bell v Midland Railway Co (1861): The Curious Case of Disputing DirectorsEmily Gordon (University College London, UK)4. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:05 pm by Michael Perry
Amici on the brief--some of whom post here at RLL--are Frederick Mark Gedicks (Brigham Young University Law School), Vincent Blasi (Columbia Law School); Caitlin Borgmann (CUNY School of Law), Caroline Mala Corbin (University of Miami School of Law), Sarah Barringer Gordon (University of Pennsylvania Law School & Dept. of History), Steven K. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am by Nicholas Mosvick
As historian Gordon Wood eloquently put it, Marshall’s greatest achievement was not invented judicial review, but “maintaining the Court’s existence and asserting its independence in a hostile Republican climate. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm by Simon Fodden
You can see all six of the videos on the IPOsgoode site or view them on YouTube, the links for which are below: Video I: Practical Examples of UGC – Daniel Rosen, Gordon Duggan, Victor Nabhan (Panel Chair) Video II: Legal Aspects of UGC – Victor Nabhan, Samuel Trosow, Leonard Glickman, Pina D’Agostino (Panel Chair) Video III: Specific UGC Legal Aspects – Eva Subotnik, Marian Hebb, Carys Craig (Panel Chair) Video IV: Contractual Practices – Eric Baptiste, Tanya… [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am by Garrett Hinck
  Vanessa Sauter shared the Lawfare Podcast, featuring an interview between Benjamin Wittes and Gordon Wood about the relationship between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson: Rosenzweig posted a video of a Federalist Society panel on international counterterrorism surveillance cooperation. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
Bandemer, although the court sidestepped an earlier opportunity to address the question in 1932 in Wood v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:22 pm by Elie Mystal
[Infamy or Praise]* When legal historians attack: Gordon Wood v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am by Amanda Rice
” The Virginian-Pilot and the Daily Press report that on Saturday retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, along with journalist Jim Lehrer and historian Gordon Wood, will receive an award from the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation and participate in a panel titled “The Responsibilities of Citizenship. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Conor McEvily
At The Conglomerate, Gordon Smith responds to the Chief Justice’s recent criticism of legal scholarship. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Emily Garcia Uhrig previews Wood v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the schedule to annex 2-B[3] of the… [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am by Rosalind English
Together with this, the test laid down by Laws LJ in  R(Wood) v Commissioner of the Metropolis  provides a firm guiding hand to this notoriously difficult balancing act: First, the alleged threat or assault to the individual’s personal autonomy must (if article 8 is to be engaged) attain ‘a certain level of seriousness’. [read post]