Search for: "Wood v. Moss"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
‘”[U]nless the ordinary experience of the fact-finder provides sufficient basis for judgingthe adequacy of the professional service, or the attorney’s conduct falls below any standard of due care, expert testimony will be necessary to establish that the attorney breached a standard of professional care and skill”‘ (Estate ofGinor v Landsberg, 960 F Supp 661, 672 [SD NY 1996], affd 159 F3d 1346 [2d Cir 1998], quoting Greene v Payne, Wood &… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
The Mishcon de Reya blog also published an article on FoIs last week, explaining the recent decision of Moss v Kingston-on-Thames and The Information Commissioner NJ/2018/0007, in which the High Court held that failure to comply with a FoI notice is contempt of court. [read post]
7 May 2021, 6:00 am
It’s made even more complicated as a result of a controversial Ninth Circuit case, Twin Books v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am
(relisted after the November 30 conference) Returning Relists Wood v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
Thanks again to Ben Moss for compiling the relists. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Thanks to Ben Moss compiling the relists. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
(relisted after the April 20, April 27, May 10, May 17, May 24, May 31, June 7, June 14 and June 21 conferences; apparently held pending approval of a settlement agreement) Wood v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:09 am
Doe v. [read post]
Settlements allowing competitors to use term doesn't insulate Clorox from its own possible deception
13 Feb 2018, 8:02 am
Gregorio v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
Moss. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
Moss. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
Moss. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am
James E. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:06 am
–––– (2014) (per curiam); Wood v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
Johnny Moss opened the seminar, and explained that there are two types of obviousness over the CGK attack. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
Division of Parks and Recreation, 54 Ohio Dt.2d (1978) (Recreational user immunity applies to both private property owners and publicly owned land) Moss v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
In Plumhoff v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:03 pm
Division of Parks and Recreation 54 Ohio Dt.2d (1978) (Recreational user immunity applies to both private property owners and publicly owned land) Moss v. [read post]
