Search for: "Woodford v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 4:27 am by Maxwell Kennerly
S. 320, 333, n. 7 (1997), and “demands that state-court decisions be given the benefit of the doubt,” Woodford v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:43 pm by Bill Otis
Instead of ending its obstructionist ways, the ACLU recommends the demonstrably unsafe alternative of LWOP, see Allen v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:08 am
Woodford, 334 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2003) to the appellate state. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Woodford, 299 F.3d 868 (C.A. 9 2002) ........................................................................... 13 Diaz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:10 am
Woodford, 395 F.3d 979, 1012-13 (9th Cir.2005) (finding that it was unconstitutional for the court and the prosecutor to present the defendant's prior crimes as the heart of three different aggravating factors); United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 1:12 pm
Woodford, No. 07-55089 (6-3-08). [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
Hope Avenue, Suite 320 Bangor, ME 04401 Phone: (207) 941-2952 Fax: (207) 941-2955 E-mail: bobbijo.yeager@ucpofmaine.org MAINE STATE RESOURCES AGING Eastern Agency on Aging 450 Essex Street Bangor, ME 04401 Phone: (207) 941-2865; (800) 432-7812 (Toll Free in-state only) Web: http://www.eaaa.org Bureau of Elder and Adult Services State House, Station 11 Augusta, ME 04333 Phone: (207) 624-5335; (800) 750-5353 (Toll Free) Fax: (207) 623-1797 Web:… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064 (9thCir. 2005) ..............................................5, 46, 52 Bethea v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]