Search for: "Woods v. Hills" Results 41 - 60 of 350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in February and March 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
If we require wood, we will chop down a tree. [read post]