Search for: "Woodward v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am by Alfred Brophy
Vann Woodward’s The Strange Career of Jim Crow (1955); Arthur I. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
United States, which made Nixon accept his guilt in the Watergate controversy by also accepting the pardon. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
In late July 1974, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 7 June 2017 judgment was handed down in the case of Woodward v Grice ([2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) The claimant was the in-house solicitor at Blackpool Football Club. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
The UK Court of Appeal case Woodward v Hutchins [1977] 1 WLR 760 – where a pop group starring Tom Jones and Engelbert Humperdink wanted to restrain their former press officer from publishing articles disclosing aspects of their private life. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm by Stephen Griffin
Vann Woodward, Origins of the New South (1951) Mark A. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm by Quinta Jurecic
The president-elect will soon learn the United States’ “deep secrets,” Bob Woodward writes at the Post—that is, its covert actions and intelligence sources and methods. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:52 am
This judgment [Hospira UK Ltd v Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC [2016] EWHC 1285 (Pat) (10 June 2016)] was handed down a little while ago, but this Kat only recently got round to studying it properly, containing as it does decisions relating to three rather different patents. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]