Search for: "Wooley v. People" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm by Richard L. Duquette
  Wooley argued the ticket in court, but the Judge upheld the ticket. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Pilling, a case I’m litigating in the Ninth Circuit; the chief (but not only) issue is whether Wooley v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:05 pm
A post in Liskow & Lewis' Energy Law Blog - guest authored by attorney Andrew Wooley - announces the Texas Supreme Court's decision on Energy Service Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:57 am by Eugene Volokh
We can’t be required to even display a license plate that says “Live Free or Die” on our car, if we object to the message; that’s what the court held in Wooley v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
For instance: Janus holds that the First Amendment generally bars compelling people to turn over money to a private organization that will use it for speech.[9] But Rumsfeld v. [read post]