Search for: "Woolley v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2012, 5:30 am by Janet Lindenmuth
Currently before the Delaware Supreme Court is Eastern Savings Bank v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm by Scott Koller
Superior Court decision in 2008, which said that a zip code does not constitute personally identifiable information. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm by M. Scott Koller
Superior Court decision in 2008, which said that a zip code does not constitute personally identifiable information. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Following critiques by some that the disclosure requirements embedded in these practice directions were too vague and potentially an overreach (see, e.g. here and here), some other Canadian courts – including the Superior Court of Quebec and three Alberta courts collectively – opted to simply caution the profession and parties about AI use rather than create new disclosure mandates. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:18 am by Elizabeth Burch
Bone, Charles Silver, and Patrick Woolley). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:30 am
Faced with a feuding couple who had “been marinating in a mutual hatred so intense as to surely amount to a personality disorder requiring treatment”, Justice Quinn, of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, decided in the case of Bruni –v-Bruni that “the parties repeatedly have shown that they are immune to reason. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
This year, the Supreme Court of Canada will likely decide Canadian National Railway v McKercher LLP. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The trial was one of the longest parenting trials in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, lasting for thirty-nine days, over nine weeks, involving over twenty witnesses including access supervisors, reunification counsellors, child protection workers, and a psychologist. [read post]