Search for: "Woolley v. United States" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Calo, Constructing the Secular: Law and Religion Jurisprudence in Europe and the United States (September 2014).Adam Lamparello, 'God Hates Fags' Is Not the Same as 'Fuck the Draft': Introducing the Non-Sexual Obscenity Doctrine, (October 8, 2014).Nadia B. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
This parallels developments in other common law jurisdictions such as the United States, England and Australia where guidance for lawyers on the ethical use of generative AI is starting to emerge. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Alice Woolley argued that he was, citing the opening paragraph of his majority opinion in Canada (Attorney General) v Igloo Vikski Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
In addition, law schools outside of Canada seek to serve the market for legal education in Canada, with Arizona State University seeking to grant a “North American law degree” to qualify graduates to practise law in both Canada and the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
Hunter referred to the case of LSUC v Joseph in detailing the inherent dangers of engaging in sexual relationships with clients. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
This issue has been considered in the United States since Watergate, but this case may be the first time it has been publicly observable here.10. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Here it is worth noting several distinctions in the legal and regulatory contexts of Canada and the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
R&TC Section 17014(b) provides a special rule for certain United States Government officials and their spouses. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Open justice David Hart QC has blogged on the UKHRB on the recent decision by the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Guardian Newspapers) v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (Wolfe v Shawcor Ltd, 2016 ABQB 261) “It seems to me at this point this is somewhat parallel to the Pythonesque description of a particular parrot” (Karl Hermanns v. [read post]