Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Pribetic for his post on the case of the day, Sanchez v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 2:19 pm
The Lord President Lord Hamilton & the Lord Justice Clerk, Lord Gill appeared before the Scottish Parliament's Justice Committee to discuss, and criticise some of the plans contained in Criminal Justice and Licensing Scotland Bill, particularly those plans relating to the ‘Sentencing Council', an idea from the Scottish Government to give communities and victims a say in the recommended lengths of… [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:26 am
Word reaches us that LB Southwark v Austin (our report on the Court of Appeal here) has been given permission by the House of Lords (or Supreme Court as it will be). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:19 am
As Fordham says: There is no better way to illustrate and celebrate Lord Bingham’s contribution to administrative law than through his own words. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 1:09 pm
Lord v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:21 pm
On 4 November 2019 Warby J gave judgment in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers [2019] EWHC 2947 (QB) finding that a MailOnline article made a defamatory allegation against the the claimant, a Conservative Member of the House of Lords. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:24 am
Not only that, but the act in question is the very real Law of Property Act 1925, which is still in force today.Sayers's in-text illustration of the legal meaning of words v. their everyday meaning wouldn't be at all out of place in a first semester law course even today:"Then again, words which are quite meaningless in your ordinary conversation may have meaning in law. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
For Lord Kitchin, and the other judges that have so far considered Actavis, what matters now is less the meaning of the words in a claim, and more inventive concept that the claim seeks to protect.What about prosecution history? [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:44 am
The move brings the Lord President into line with the wishes of the Scottish Government, who fell over themselves to castigate the UK’s Supreme Court and even it’s Scottish judges after rulings in the Cadder v HMA case and Nat Fraser appeal.The Lord President’s representations to Westminster can be read online HERENow that the Lord President has ‘rolled over’ to make a judicial request to back up the harsh words from Scottish… [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
The opinion of their Lordships is contained in the speech of Lord Hoffmann, to whose words Lord Walker of Gestinthorpe could add nothing useful. [read post]
27 May 2008, 1:32 am
Regina v Asfaw House of Lords “The humanitarian aims of the UN Convention and Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (1951) (Cmd 9171) and (1967) (Cmnd 3906) were to be achieved by construing its words purposively. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:31 pm
Further, as Lord Coledridge said in Harris v Qarre (1879) 4 CPD 125, an action for defamation turns not on the fact of a defendant having used defamatory expressions, but the fact of him having used those defamatory expressions. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:30 am
I think that Tom Bingham very much took the lead in this regard when he was Senior Law Lord. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
This, according to Lord Irvine, was an unwarranted gloss on the statutory words which has, since, led judges to proceed on the false premise that they are some sense bound or “as good as bound” by ECtHR rulings. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:31 am
This particular guest Kat was chuckling just yesterday over these elegantly understated words written by Sir Hugh Laddie while a Judge in the Patents Court, and quoted in the House of Lords decision in Conor v Angiotech: "A company which has spent millions of dollars on research and has produced a valuable new drug will be understandably irritated when, say, a court declares the patent invalid for obviousness, thereby opening up the market to competitors. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
His words prevent justice being done. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:40 am
” Lord Neuberger also raised the question of whether anonymous speech is even capable of protection in the Internet age, and remarked on Mr Justice Eady’s conclusions in Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Ltd [2009] EWHC 1358 (QB), that bogging is a public activity with no reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:15 am
[1] See Lord Hope’s judgment in McInnes v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 7, 2010 SC (UKSC) 28 [2] R v Graham [1997] 1 Cr App R 302, 208 per Lord Bingham of Cornhill CJ [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
Any additional words of this kind merely add emphasis and do not modify the substance of the test. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
