Search for: "Working v. Black " Results 1 - 20 of 5,771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” Daniels described feeling “blacked out,” though she was not drunk or drugged. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Acts: (1) make it easier and less costly for businesses to establish and administer retirement savings plans; (2) require new 401(k) plans to have automatic enrollment features; (3) render long-term, part-time workers (i.e. those that worked 500 or more hours over two consecutive years) eligible to participate in their employer’s retirement plan; (4) allow employers to provide de minimis financial incentives to induce employees to participate in the employer’s plan;… [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The ALJ, who worked within the Drug Enforcement Administration, concluded that marijuana should be rescheduled. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]