Search for: "Worth v. Price*"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2016, 8:59 am
At the time, the payment was worth about $360,000. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
., Fort Worth Indep. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied); Baty v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
The judge's statement and the question with which the previous paragraph concluded are both worth holding up to particular scrutiny in light of the recent jury ruling in the Apple v Samsung dispute in the US. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court decided this week the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court decided this week the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court decided this week the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court decided this week the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 6:41 am
v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:41 pm
See, e.g., Gunder’s Auto Center v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:16 pm
–Solid Host v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
It's worth noting that a Stanford Law School clinic is representing Engine here.It's disappointing and inexplicable that no major app developer organization filed a brief. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:10 am
[I]f Twitter v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:36 am
Arizona v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:19 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with comments by Eric] Davis v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Sources: Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:31 pm
In the previous post I published and reported on Judge Robart's historic FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:26 pm
It's worth noting that users weren't represented in this litigation and had no ability to show that their uses were fair, notwithstanding BMG v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
This is where I think a paradigm shift is in order: the more junior attorneys conceptualize themselves as one-person enterprises, regardless of whether someone else sees them as an employee, the more they will be in a position to demand (or create for themselves) the kind of experience they need and desire.As a bit of an afterthought, it's also worth noting that clients will be increasingly unwilling to subsidize the highly inefficient training models of large law… [read post]
