Search for: "Worth v. U.s.*"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,565
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
Although most assume this is just a practical obstacle to a contemporary prosecution, it's worth reminding folks about "desuetude"—the legal doctrine pursuant to which statutes (especially criminal ones) may lapse if they are never enforced (interested readers should check out a fantastic 2006 student note on the subject in the Harvard Law Review). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
In Wyers v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
While certification to the Supreme Court is unlikely to return to common practice, it’s a procedure worth knowing and in appropriate cases asking for. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
For what it's worth, I think the Court probably reached the right result with respect to the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court, albeit not quite for the right reasons. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
A video is worth a thousand pictures. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Under Lorillard v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
But it’s worth noting that even in mid-February, we have a pair of cases still hanging around from the end-of-summer long conference and on their 11th relists. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
Particularly in South Texas and along the IH35 corridor through North Texas and the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, the danger of illegal re-entry charges is real for a growing number of people. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:40 am
He failed to do so, the court concluded, because certain directors did not face a substantial likelihood of liability for the oversight, waste, and disclosure claims, and one of the directors was sufficiently independent from Skechers’ founder and largest shareholder (Conte v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
A first question worth asking is where Chinese antiquities are going—whether they flow to “market nations” or circulate domestically. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 6:56 am
I seriously doubt it–if they ever got caught with their fingers in the cookie jar on this scam, would it be worth the pittance that they will end up getting in pocket after all mouths are fed? [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm
It too would be determined in each state by the state's own processes, subject perhaps to the possibility, flagged in the literature on Powell v. [read post]
