Search for: "Worthy v. The Commissioners"
Results 81 - 100
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Zappone & Gilligan v Revenue Commissioners In the fog of celebration (and, indeed, cynicism) that has surrounded the passage of the Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010 it has, perhaps, been easy to forget that the landmark case of Zappone & Gilligan v Revenue Commissioners continues to await its Supreme Court hearing here in Ireland (information on the KAL Case). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:38 am
On the other hand, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Hurley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
For despite a smokescreen argument that reclassification is necessary to implement the NBP, everyone knows that today’s NOI was motivated by the Commission’s crushing defeat in Comcast v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:41 pm
It will be heard along with the case of Springer v Germany (no. 39954/08). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 5:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:48 am
Cavel v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 3:21 pm
FTC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:53 am
The recent i4i v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
I'm going to suggest that there is plenty of juicy stuff in here, albeit obiter, that is worthy of consideration. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
I'm going to suggest that there is plenty of juicy stuff in here, albeit obiter, that is worthy of consideration. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
Some things, the rule says, simply aren't worthy of belief, so they must not be true.The key word is belief.Look, I explain to the client who tells me that it's his word against the word of the cop so he can't be convicted because that's a reasonable doubt. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
This was the result in Bordeleau v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:56 am
There was two other exchanges involving Commissioner Len Katz worthy of note. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:09 am
As hinted in the title to this post, I think there are a lot of interesting (and blog-worthy) reentry stories related to this high-profile case. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:02 pm
Second, we must ask whether each argument justifies its conclusion, or whether there is reason to see the argument as a rationalization of some deeper sort of anxiety or aversion ("animus", to use the language of Romer v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:56 am
Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead & Watts LLP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
Commissioner 71 TC 560 (1979). [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 8:46 pm
(Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
FTC v. [read post]
