Search for: "Wraggs v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
It would be different, perhaps, if there was evidence of some massive state conspiracy to protect lawbreakers from criminal sanctions, but that scenario is far removed from what is happening here. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
” United States The US songwriter Phoebe Bridgers is being sued for defamation by producer Chris Nelson, who claims she “intentionally used her high-profile public platform on Instagram to publish false and defamatory statements regarding [Nelson] in order to destroy his reputation. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
We had a news post and an analytical piece by Paul Wragg. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm
As the particulars of claim make clear: ‘the claimants were deeply shocked and extremely distressed at the public revelation of these tragic and highly sensitive family matters which have been kept private (or ‘secret’ as the Defendant itself states in the article) for over 30 years. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm
Inforrm had a piece by Paul Wragg, Saint Piers, Free Speech Martyr. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm
Furthermore, in Handyside v United Kingdom Strasbourg accepted that freedom of speech applies to views which shock and offend and which are heartily disapproved of by the recipient [49]. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation Hacked Off had a post “Paul Wragg: A Free and Regulated Press”. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm
We have had 450,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and the Philippines making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
United States Binance has filed a lawsuit in the state of New Jersey against Forbes Media and two of its journalists, alleging that an article published under the title “Leaked ‘Tai Chi’ Document Reveals Binance’s Elaborate Scheme To Evade Bitcoin Regulators” was defamatory. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
” Inforrm received record numbers of views for Paul Wragg’s two part post on the Mail on Sunday’s Defence in the Meghan Markle privacy and copyright case, “A Study in Poverty, Part 1 and Part 2). [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:27 pm
Although this qualification applies equally to media and non-media actors, the chief purpose of the qualification is to provide Member States with a mechanism for preventing the modern mass media from abusing its power. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:53 pm
In the first, Tower Hamlets v The Times, the newspaper was ‘ordered’ to publish a summary of the adjudication. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
TLU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2217. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:24 am
We have had 425,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Their involvement was clearly stated on the front page of the Court of Appeal judgment and they must be concerned about the potential damage to their reputation so casually inflicted by Hain’s action. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
We had a post by Paul Wragg suggesting that action could be brought against him. [read post]
