Search for: "Wright v Bank of Am." Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 2:24 am by Dave
Wright v Wright [2010] EWHC 1808 (Ch) is a near perfect example of a fundamental principle of property law, which we tutors seek to ingrain into our students (mostly, it must be said, with limited success, having looked at hundreds of exam scripts), that intention is what determines the type of interest created or transferred (trust, gift, loan, bailment etc). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:24 am by Dave
Wright v Wright [2010] EWHC 1808 (Ch) is a near perfect example of a fundamental principle of property law, which we tutors seek to ingrain into our students (mostly, it must be said, with limited success, having looked at hundreds of exam scripts), that intention is what determines the type of interest created or transferred (trust, gift, loan, bailment etc). [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The statement complained of in the TED Talk was as follows: “… I am not even going to get into the lies that Arron Banks has told about his covert relationship with the Russian Government. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Barclays, Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank have indicated that they are cooperating with various regulators. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The failure of a party to disclose a cause of action as an asset in a prior bankruptcy proceeding, which the party knew or should have known existed at the time of that proceeding, deprives him or her of "the legal capacity to sue subsequently on that cause of action" (Whelan v Longo, 23 AD3d 459, 460, affd 7 NY3d 821; see Dynamics Corp. of Am. v Marine Midland Bank-N.Y., 69 NY2d 191, 195-196; Santori v Met Life, 11 AD3d 597, 599; 123 Cutting… [read post]