Search for: "Wu v. Holder" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 4:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In contrast, a fraudulently induced deed is merely voidable, not void (see Marden v Dorthy, 160 NY at 150; Dalessio v Kressler, 6 AD3d 57, 61 [2d Dept 2004]; Yin Wu v Wu, 288 AD2d at 105). [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 2:57 pm
" Tim Wu, Slate.com: J.K. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:16 am by gmlevine
The first to register principle is illustrated in Neptune Orient Lines Limited v. cnwonder.com c/o Wu Guiqiang, FA1002001310401 (Nat. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:17 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
For the SDNY, copyright law gives copyright owners and their exclusive licensees the right to freely grant a license "after the fact" as they see fit, quoting Wu v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:03 am by Dennis Crouch
  However, that model is different than the rights-holder filing on its own behalf. [2] See Beech Aircraft Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Wu: Good to make clear that descriptive claims are really cover for normative claims about value of branding. [read post]