Search for: "Wu v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and  United States, to name but a few. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am by Glenn
That competition concern harkens all the way back to United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
” The result is a sweeping rereading of American history that emphasizes the need to understand immigration and the United States in global perspectives. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:51 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
I have a number of other articles in the works on topics including legislative responses to mass shootings for a symposium issue of the Connecticut Law Review, 3D Printing and the Second Amendment for a symposium issue of the Tennessee Law Review (a key application of how data and speech are connected), Kennedy’s Constitutional Chimera (blogged about earlier), the story behind United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm by Ken White
In December United States District Court Judge George Wu granted our motion to dismiss, but without prejudice — that is, he gave Naffe once chance to amend to see if she could state a valid claim. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm by Ken White
In December United States District Court Judge George Wu granted our motion to dismiss, but without prejudice — that is, he gave Naffe once chance to amend to see if she could state a valid claim. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Wu: are you requiring strict scrutiny? [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
., Lawyers hail Yunnan's suspension of laojiao system, SINA, Feb. 8, 2013;  Guangdong to stop "laojiao" system in China, CCTV.com English, Jan. 30, 2013; Wu Jiao, New law to abolish laojiao system, China Daily, March 1, 2007. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am by Chris Castle
  Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]