Search for: "Wynn v. Harris"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Other tributes noted his participation in the landmark case of Halpern v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:28 am
Judge Wynn dissented. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 11:30 am
James Wynn (4th Cir.) [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
Judge Wynn wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Judges Motz, Thacker, Harris, and Keenan. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Last month, a federal appeals panel gave the back of its hand to Rep. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Wynne & Jaffe, 599 F. 2d 707, 712–13 (5th Cir. 1979); Mateer v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Wynne & Jaffe, 599 F. 2d 707, 712–13 (5th Cir. 1979); Mateer v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Clayton County Georgia, Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Clayton County Georgia, Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm
Claim of malicious prosecution for offense of blocking sidewalk could proceed; grant of summary judgment reversed Salley v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
Hudson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 5:54 pm
Most casinos are owned by a handful of companies like Harrah’s or Wynn’s resorts. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:07 pm
In Manning v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
In Godoy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Sellers, McCoy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
