Search for: "Wynne v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
In his Proclamation 5517 (1986), he justified this exclusion on the ground that he “found that the unrestricted entry into the United States as immigrants by Cuban citizens would . . . be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
The order’s focus faces outward towards the alien residents of the subject countries, not inward towards persons in the United States like the plaintiffs . . . . [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
In Part III, I will focus on the far more modest concurring opinions of Judges Keenan and Thacker, which were aimed at the Supreme Court, and the far less modest concurring opinion of Judge Wynn. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
The “it” in Giuliani’s explanation could also refer to pausing certain immigration temporarily, in order to assess whether the United States’ current criteria for screening immigrants actually work. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
IRAP v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:50 pm
Circuit Judge Paul V. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Judge Wynn wrote a concurring opinion. [read post]
4th Circuit En Banc Upholds Preliminary Injunction Against Trump's Second Travel Ban Executive Order
25 May 2017, 1:11 pm
§ 1182(f) before he can exclude a group of aliens that entry of that group of aliens would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.Judge Wynn filed a concurring opinion indicating that he would also find that the Executive Order exceeded the President's authority under the Immigration Act. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
The Constitution generally does not protect noncitizens abroad who have no previous ties to the United States. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:11 am
That’s the case in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:50 pm
State and Folsom v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Quill Corporation v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:22 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , November 17, 2016, Wynne, R.). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 10:57 am
CubeSmart L.P., however, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey found that companies could use savings clauses that “attempt…to conform to New Jersey law. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:42 pm
Plus has a neat little stateless-citizen-federal-diversity-jurisdiction issue thrown in there for good measure.But I nonetheless can't help thinking that it's the equivalent of an opinion that says that exactly 48.6 angels can fit on an average-size pin manufactured in the eastern seaboard of the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:42 am
On June 30, 2016, the SJC granted Further Appellate Review on the parties' cross-petitions in Blanchard v. [read post]
