Search for: "X v. United States Congress et al" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am by Barry Sookman
Earlier today, a number of international and foreign associations and copyright scholars filed an Amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in the ABC, Inc. et al v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Justice O'Connor cited it in the plurality opinion in Hamdi et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Wolfgang Demino
District Court with subject matter jurisdiction.INDIA SAMONE KAHCLAMAT, Plaintiff,v.WILLIAM NASH, ET AL., Defendants.No. 3:18-cv-464-G-BN.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am by Jennifer Davis
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) and Yasui v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
 Despite the fact that neither Congress nor DOJ has yet taken steps sufficient to disqualify Trump from holding federal office, he might nevertheless be constitutionally ineligible to hold any future state or federal office, including the presidency, by virtue of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:10 am by New Books Script
K 5410 T6 L65 2011 Transnational torture : law, violence, and state power in the United States and India Jinee Lokaneeta. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Congress still had the authority to “provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States,” and those broad powers would have to suffice. [read post]