Search for: "Yoder v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2019, 5:01 am by Howard Friedman
Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).The suit challenges the Guidelines on other state law grounds as well. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
At least that is the person I heard when I read your 1973 article and who materialized at the Convention.So, as an advocate for child sex abuse victims across the United States, I ask you—what will you do as President of the United States about child sex abuse to stem the pain, to increase justice, and to ultimately reduce this billion-dollar burden on our healthcare system? [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 11:08 pm
The majority held: RFRA's stated purpose is to "restore the compelling interest test as set forth in Sherbert v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 10:56 am by Mark Jaycox and Mark M. Jaycox
  Many courts, including the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, in addition to the Supreme Court of the United States's landmark decisions in Meyer, Pierce, and Yoder, the fundamental right of a parent to homeschool his or her child is also supported by Washington v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am by Eugene Volokh
(This is still the rule in about a dozen states that have interpreted their state constitutional religious exemption provisions as following the Sherbert/Yoder model.) [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Neomi Rao, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit My understanding is that Prof. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:58 am by Elsie Gonzalez, Esq.
Supreme Court decisions regarding the fundamental right to parent one’s child, he wrote:  “United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote on behalf of the Court in the case of Troxel v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Class #7 The Freedom of (Illiberal) Association United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 5:04 pm by Sophia Cope
United States by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the government violated the Fourth Amendment when it obtained emails stored by third parties without a probable cause warrant. [read post]