Search for: "Yoo v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Summit Asset Strategies Investment Management, LLC; Summit Asset Strategies Wealth Management, LLC; and Chris Yoo Case Number: 15-cv-01429 (United States District Court for the Western District of Washington) Date Filed: September 4, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 6, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-144 SEC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm
Moussaoui v. the United States Transcripts of the hearing in which Zacarias Moussaoui attempted to plead guilty (PDF), the hearing (PDF) at which he did, and the trial session at which he testified. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:58 am by Ilya Somin
One of the most notable ambiguities in Kavanaugh's record is the question of what he really thinks about the validity of the United States v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:53 am
But if it ever did, then of course what the United States itself argued about attorney culpability in the Justice Case could be pertinent to any claims and defenses raised in such an international tribunal.4. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Robert Schapiro comments on the potential implications that the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Without H.B. 20, which would outlaw such censorship, the EU may end up determining what gets said on social media worldwide, including in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Writing for the Brookings Institution, Lisa V. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm by Erin Miller
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”) eliminated the writ of habeas corpus for any “alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:45 pm by Jack Goldsmith
Despite its then shaky legal position, the administration had a legitimate concern with the safety of United States personnel stationed abroad. [read post]