Search for: "York v. Daniels" Results 141 - 160 of 1,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered: March 21, 2023 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered: March 21, 2023 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:32 pm by Howard Bashman
” And on this evening’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered,” Nina Totenberg had an audio segment titled “Jack Daniel’s v. poop-themed dog toy in a trademark case at the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 3:48 am by SHG
Daniels on the eve of the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 3:18 pm by Staci Zaretsky
Stormy Daniels hush money payout scheme, that is. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:15 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
The case deals with the topic of whether the registration of slogans is allowed by EU trade mark law.Katfriend Paolo Maria Gangi reviewed the decision of the Southern District Court of New York, issued on 14 February 2023, seeing the French Luxury House Hermès against NFT creator Rothschild.Katfriends Gillian Tan and Mark Teng discussed a recent decision issued by the Court of Appeal of Singapore clarifying the meaning and application of Singapore's judicial understanding of… [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:13 am by Emma Snell
Daniels ruled that federal courts lacked legal jurisdiction to seize the funds. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Daniel Gilman
Given the Supreme Court’s recent articulation of the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (New York Univ. v Farkas, 121 Misc 2d 643, 646 [Civ Ct, NY County 1983].) [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Alexandra Walsh
For example, in the seminal case Goss v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]