Search for: "York v. Fields" Results 101 - 120 of 2,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 5:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Gopstein v Bellinson Law, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33476(U) October 4, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159060/2022 Judge: Mary V. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
As you might expect, there has been a lot of press coverage of yesterday's argument in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs… [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:28 am by Ashby Jones
On the one hand, yes, it is insane to sue a pre-school for anything short of leaving little Johnny overnight in an abandoned field. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
For various reasons, the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision on Tuesday in Haywood v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:51 am by Peter Mahler
 PFT Technology LLC v Wieser, Short Form Order, Index No. 8679/12 [Sup Ct Nassau County Feb. 20, 2014]. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:07 pm
Turning to what the experts over at Eyewitness Identification are saying: last month the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:16 am
The more you blog, the more you realize that people take offense at the smallest perceived slights.)Anyway, today's happy news is Arons v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 8:41 am by Lindsay Colvin Stone
The Guidance specifies that covered employers must comply with the Salary Transparency Law when advertising for positions “that can or will be performed, in whole or in part, in New York City, whether from an office, in the field, or remotely from the employee’s home. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:06 am by Neil Cahn
The entire area may have been turned on its head in 2010 by the Court of Appeals in Fields v. [read post]