Search for: "Youcheng Wu v Jian Xu"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2020, 3:03 am
Although Perlman’s conduct may give rise to a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, it was not frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130.1-1 (see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]; see generally Youcheng Wu v Jian Xu, 137 AD3d 1016, 1016 [2016]). [read post]