Search for: "Young v. Brewer"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Michael Young cites the Court’s 1995 ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:14 pm
(State Board of Equalization v Young, 299 US 59 (1936)). [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am
Gabriel ArmandarizIn March 2015, a Tarrant County jury rejected the death penalty for Gabriel Armandariz, who was convicted of strangling his two young sons in April 2011 in Graham. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
By guest bloggers Jeff Breinholt and Madeline Brewer [Jeff is an Adjunct Professor at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:12 am
” Jacobellis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:00 pm
" Jacobellis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:46 pm
On June 27, 2017, the Fifth Circuit in Brewer v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
Waitangi Day protest, 2006 (Photo by Flickr user Charlie Brewer, Feb. 6, 2006, used under Creative Commons License 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). 1901: In Nireaha Tamaki v Baker, the Privy Council in London ruled that the courts did have jurisdiction to determine whether the land in dispute had been ceded to the Crown, in contrast to the approach that the New Zealand courts had taken since the Wi Parata case. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:20 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in (among others) Young v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
[xxiii] For example, in Brewer v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
In Henry v. [read post]
