Search for: "Young v. Butts" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 12:52 pm by Jerry Salcido
During previous encounters, K.M. has had to tell Rackham to not touch her after he would lift up her shirt, grab her butt, etc. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Ashworth v Nine Network Australia (No.2) ([2019] NSWDC 188) Gibson DCJ dismissed defamation claims for a broadcast and three online newspaper publications imputing that he is famous for sleazy scams and shonky businesses and that he engaged in dishonest business activities to trick young women into group sex. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
He queries: "What about a second appeal by me to the House of Lords following the precedent set by Buttes Gas v Hammer [1982] AC 888 (see here), with the House of Lords granting me leave to appeal and then choosing to follow the European Patent Officeapproach (particularly now that the Technical Appeal Board has asserted in T 154/04 has asserted, in robust terms, their view that Jacob LJ was quite wrong, and given detail as to how they think he got it so wrong)? [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:41 am by Shain Wasser
While Planned Parenthood’s indiscretions have undoubtedly hurt a multitude of young girls, the court in Roe et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:30 am by SHG
There is a grand total of one decision,  G.G. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
includes a segment about a mouse taking care of its young; Mountains includes a segment about [a] beaver taking care of its young. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:11 pm
In that case, a young man was in custody at RCMP headquarters for five days. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm by Patrick
Our butts hurt in sympathy for Mr. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am by SHG
  Isn't it worth a finger up your child's butt? [read post]