Search for: "Young v. Cross et al" Results 41 - 60 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm by James Kwong
***OpportunitiesATRIP – ATRIP Essay Competition 2022 for Young Researchers in Intellectual Property LawD/L for submissions: 15 January 2023The ATRIP’s Executive Committee is launching its annual essay competition for young researchers (not older than 35 years of age). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The Issues on Appeal Here is the summary of the issues presented in this round from the Judiciary web site: Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees James Sherman et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James P. Flynn
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am by Ricky E. Bagolie
OCs (Estimated Relative Risk or Odds Ratio with 95% CI) Bloemenkamp et al,[8]1995 Case-Control 2.2 (0.9-5.4) Spitzer (Transnational),[9] 1996 Case-Control 1.5 (1.1-2.2) Bloemankamp et al,[13] 1999 Case-Control 1.9 (0.8-4.5) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[14] 2000 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9 (1.3-2.8)/2.3 (1.3-3.9) Farley et al (WHO),[6] 1995 Case-Control 2.4 (1.3-4.6) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[7] 1995 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Young Accuseds; BailR. v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
There is also the serious risk of cross-contamination between raw meat and other food items intended to be eaten without cooking. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Instead, this 40% magnitude of reduction results only in a loss of chance which is not compensable in medical malpractice cases (See: Cottrelle et al v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Jim Gerl
Nansel et. al., Cross-national Consistency in the Relationship Between Bullying Behaviors and Psychosocial Adjustment, 158 Archive of Pediatric and Adolescent Med. 730, 733-35 (2004). [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
  Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33]  With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm by Bill Marler
”[29]  As few as twenty organisms have been said to be sufficient to infect a person and, as a result, possibly kill them.[30]  And unlike generic E. coli, the O157:H7 serotype multiplies at temperatures up to 44° Fahrenheit, survives freezing and thawing, is heat resistant, grows at temperatures up to 111° Fahrenheit, resists drying, and can survive exposure to acidic environments.[31] And, finally, to make it even more of a dangerous threat, E. coli O157:H7 bacteria are… [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]