Search for: "Young v. Department of Hospitals" Results 1 - 20 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2016, 8:25 am by Liisa Speaker
The Michigan Supreme Court heard oral arguments in McLain v City of Lansing Fire Department on October 6, 2016 to decide whether to grant leave to appeal. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:09 pm by nyinjuries
• Seniors and young children were most likely to be hospitalized for a dog bite. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:37 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young As readers of our blog know from prior posts, we have argued successfully before several courts that the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:09 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The father sustained a serious personal injury as result of this tragic boating accident, and he is still in the hospital being treated. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
Folkerte then read a department-prepared consent card to defendant, informing defendant that he had the right to refuse consent. [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
CHILD INSUFFICIENTLY COMPENSATED FOR BURNSAfter a New York County Supreme Court jury awarded a 16-year-old plaintiff $29,585.000 for past pain and suffering, and another $29,585,000 for future pain and suffering (over 54 years), together with 9% interest thereon, the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education, and other defendants, appealed to the Appellate Division, First Department.Sadly, the young plaintiff reportedly suffered “catastrophic injuries”… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am by Karwan Eskerie
In reliance upon a statement of Stanley Burnton J (as he was then) in R(D) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 MHLR 17, the Judge held that no detention authority would be acting rationally where once there were reasonable grounds for believing that a detainee required treatment in a mental hospital, the authority did not expeditiously take reasonable steps to obtain appropriate medical advice and if the need for transfer to a hospital was… [read post]