Search for: "Young v. General Services Admin."
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm
Indiana Family & Social Services Admin., expressly disagreed with the Fourth Circuit's analysis. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
R (Bonhoeffer) v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 1585 (Admin) – read judgment This post was coauthored by Richard Mumford and Joanna Glynn QC. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 am
Updated | SG v St Gregory’s Catholic Science College [2011] EWHC 1452 (Admin) (17 June 2010) – Read judgment Most people have their first taste of injustice at school. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
R (on the application of E and Ors) v The Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 1465 (Admin) – Read Judgment In a case involving rather distressing facts, the High Court has quashed a decision of the Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute a 14-year-old girl (identified only as “E”) for the sexual abuse of her younger siblings. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
R (on the application of MK) v Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council [2013] EWHC 3486 (Admin) [Judgment on Lexis, not on Bailii yet]A judicial review raising the extent of a Council’s duties and powers under s.17 Children Act 1989 and s.1 Localism Act 2011 (the general power of competence) in providing housing for someone not otherwise eligible for housing assistance.MK was from Nigeria. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
R (on the application of MK) v Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council [2013] EWHC 3486 (Admin) [Judgment on Lexis, not on Bailii yet]A judicial review raising the extent of a Council’s duties and powers under s.17 Children Act 1989 and s.1 Localism Act 2011 (the general power of competence) in providing housing for someone not otherwise eligible for housing assistance.MK was from Nigeria. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:08 am
There is even a case where the High Court managed to stretch this principle to breaking point (and in fact, as we shall see below and as I thought at the time, did break it) when it held that an authority was deemed to have accommodated a child under s.20 even though it was the UK Border Agency who had provided the accommodation on the grounds that the social services authority had carried out an assessment of the child before the accommodation was provided: R (R) v Croydon LBC… [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Serv., Admin. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 12:46 pm
Nur & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Birmingham City Council (2020) EWHC 3526 (Admin) This was (part of) a judicial review of Birmingham’s implementation of its own allocation scheme. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
See Barnett v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:49 am
Bukartyk, R (on the application of) v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (2019) EWHC 3480 (Admin) A judicial review of a refusal to take a second homeless application which should really be put in the ‘Councils, don’t do this’ list of things that councils shouldn’t do. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 4:51 am
McKerr v United Kingdom, at para. 111). [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
Finally, they sought to convince the court that there could be no expectation on the part of the service users that they would not engage with those who entered the Centre, as abortion is a controversial topic of general public importance. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
The fact that O’Connor v Aldershot Magistrates Court [2016] EWHC 2792 (Admin)involved the founder of the well-known family law campaigning group Fathers4Justice adds interest, though not relevance, to the case. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
US General Services Admin, against two recent cases that cite violation of VARA in their respective complaints. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
It is entitled to have regard to them in assessing needs (R v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Simpsons-Sears Ltd., 1985 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1985] 2 S.C.R. 536, 52 O.R. (2d) 799 (note), 17 Admin. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
