Search for: "Young v. King" Results 41 - 60 of 527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What they wanted was freedom from parliamentary control—the “sovereignty” of the “King in Parliament”—and genuine self-government. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Elin Hofverberg
Princess Ingrid is first in line to succeed her father, Crown Prince Haakon, who himself will succeed his father, King Harald V. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am by Sandy Levinson
  Part of American Stetll sets out the collapse of an older liberal consensus on the meaning of "separation of church and state," encapsulated in the rhetoric (if not necessarily the result) in Everson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  But World War II ultimately had a much bigger effect, as the young men returning home from war had opportunities to go to college or pursue other, more promising careers. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
I can not pay $88,764.73 all at once, as I mentioned to Young on the phone. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
For example, a film option signed by Stephen King in 1994 for the novel Carrie, written in 1974, could be terminated sometime between 2029 and 2034. [read post]
Historical analyses of the phrase look to 1215 when, in the Magna Carta, King John of England promised to condemn no freeman but “by the Law of the Land. [read post]